Beast (2017)

UK / 107 minutes / color / Stray Bear, Agile, Film 4, BFI, Altitude Dir & Scr: Michael Pearce Pr: Ivana MacKinnon, Lauren Dark, Kristian Brodie Cine: Benjamin Kračun Cast: Jessie Buckley, Johnny Flynn, Geraldine James, Trystan Gravelle, Shannon Tarbet, Charley Palmer Rothwell, Hattie Gotobed, Olwen Fouéré, Emily Taaffe, Tim Woodward, Barry Aird, Oliver Maltman, Tyrone Lopez.

In order to discuss this movie sensibly I’m going to have to commit a few spoilers. I’m not going to give away the solution to the crime—or the series of crimes—because the movie itself doesn’t do that, instead leaving various possibilities open for us to debate heatedly in the pub on the way home from the cinema. But in order to explain that enigma I’m going to have to give away quite a lot of the information leading up to its presentation, including the movie’s finale. So, if you’re one of those people who can’t watch a production of Othello if you already know the ending, beware.

On the island of Jersey (for readers outside Europe, the island’s to the south of England’s south coast and roughly equidistant from France), Moll Humford (Buckley) lives with her parents, looking after her dementia-afflicted dad Fletcher (Woodward) some of the time and working as a bus-tour guide. At 27 she’s a bit old to still be living at home, but fourteen years ago she stuck a pair of scissors into a bullying schoolmate, Tamara (Taaffe), and since then she’s been treated as someone potentially dangerous.

Two faces of Jessie Buckley as Moll

The family as a whole is under the thumb of Moll’s über-controlling mother Hilary (James). Moll’s elder brother Harrison (Maltman) and her sister Polly (Tarbet), who’s clearly lost in admiration of her own cuteness, plus Harrison’s teenage daughter Jade (Gotobed), make up the rest of the pack. Although her siblings have clearly realized that discretion’s the better part of valor so far as their mother’s concerned, Moll keeps breaking the rules and being forced to make humiliating public apologies.

Moll also has difficulty dealing with the suffocating snobbery of the others (Jade and Fletcher excepted).

Geraldine James as Hilary

When Polly hijacks Moll’s birthday party—supposedly her big occasion—with the announcement that she’s expecting twins, Moll storms out to a local nightclub and spends the rest of the night dancing and drinking with Leigh (Rothwell). As they make their way home in the early morning he become sexually aggressive toward her. Luckily local poacher and jack-of-all-trades Pascal Renouf (Flynn) steps in to save her, and soon a romance blossoms—to the horror of Hilary, Polly and Harrison.

Johnny Flynn as Pascal

A serial killer has been strangling teenaged girls on the island, and Pascal, who has a suggestive police record, is one of the cops’ suspects. The latest victim was abducted while Moll was dancing with Leigh at that niterie, and it seems to her merely a technical lie to say the person she was dancing with was Pascal, thereby giving him an alibi. After all, Pascal couldn’t really be guilty, could he?

The cops think otherwise—especially Clifford (Gravelle), who’s long carried a torch for Moll and would like nothing better than to see her latest flame locked away for a few decades.

Trystan Gravelle as Clifford

That’s the general setup, as expounded during the first one-third or so of the movie. From there on the components of the plot are familiar enough, although the way they’re handled keeps us constantly in doubt about the truth of what’s going on: thuggish local vigilantes like Stuart (Aird) target their first-choice scapegoat, immigrant Portuguese farm laborer Nuño Alvarez (Lopez); Pascal is arrested on suspicion of being the killer, so Stuart and his knuckleheaded cronies shift their attentions to Moll; the cops find strong evidence that points to Nuño Alvarez after all, so Pascal is released . . . but Moll suspects, and so do we, that, whatever the DNA evidence might indicate, Nuño’s innocent and Pascal’s the killer.

As I say, these are familiar tropes. But we don’t recognize them as such at the time, partly because of the flair of the screenplay, partly because of Benjamin Kračun’s evocative cinematography of Jersey’s astonishing coastal and other landscapes (I began to wonder why Peter Jackson chose to go all the way to New Zealand to film his Tolkien movies when there was Jersey right there on his doorstep), but mainly because of the cast.

Shannon Tarbet as Polly

Jessie Buckley outstands, with a performance that rightly brought her a whole bunch of awards and nominations, including a Best Actress nomination and the Most Promising Newcomer gong at the British Independent Film Awards, a Best Actress nomination at the Evening Standard British Film Awards, and a win at the London Critics Circle Film Awards as British/Irish Actress of the Year. Her Moll is clearly a troubled individual, possibly autistic, clearly “difficult,” a problem for those around her due to her unpredictability and the trouble she has fitting in with other people’s expectations. Perhaps because of all that, she’s an immensely sympathetic figure to us, the audience. Buckley fills her depiction of Moll with nuance, her eyes in particular conveying her mercurial emotions except when she’s deliberately using them as veils to hide feelings that are maybe darker than we’d like to conjecture. It helps that Kračun’s camera is clearly—and understandably—in love with the expressiveness of her face.

Johnny Flynn, as Pascal, delivers a strong turn too, while necessarily playing second fiddle. I did, though, have slight doubts from time to time about his accent; to be fair, I barely know the Jersey accent so the fault may be mine rather than his.

Emily Taaffe as Tamara

Geraldine James as the iron-willed mother, relentlessly sowing dysfunction throughout her family in the unremitting belief she’s doing the best thing for all, plays her part with such conviction that I actually found myself becoming quite uncomfortable watching her. In the same way as with Barry Aird’s dimwitted thug Stuart, you know that here is someone with whom there’s not the slightest point in trying to conduct a rational argument: it’s her way or the highway.

In the midst of everything else there’s a nice cameo from Olwen Fouéré as D.I. Theresa Kelly, brought in from the mainland to spearhead the inquiry into the killings. Kelly’s in her way a diluted version of Geraldine James’s character but with far better social skills.

Okay, back to the plot:

So Pascal’s been released from police custody and he and Moll are trying to rebuild. After a huge argument between them reveals his violent streak, Moll’s nascent suspicion that, whatever the cops have now concluded, he might after all be the serial killer comes bubbling to the surface. But she still loves him.

Benjamin Kračun’s cinematography of the Jersey coastal and other landscapes adds greatly to the movie’s impact

As the pair sit in an outdoor café preparing to have lunch, she explains to him that she’ll love him forever even if he killed those girls, but only if he’s honest with her about it and admits his guilt. After all, she’s now prepared to admit to him that it wasn’t in self-defense, an “accident,” that she stuck those scissors into Tamara fourteen years ago: it was a deliberate assault, and Moll wanted to kill her. “We’re both the same” is the case Moll advances to him.

So Pascal tells her that, yes, he was the murderer, but those girls meant nothing to him and it’s all behind him now.

The extraordinary impact of Beast’s conclusion when it comes just a few minutes later is that we don’t know if Pascal’s telling the truth here or not.

Did he really kill those girls? Or is he just trying to help Moll assuage her own long-term feelings of guilt and defectiveness by pretending he’s just as bad as she is—worse, in fact? Does he believe that a false confession on his part will be the cement that will bind together their relationship for the rest of their lives?

The shattering events of Beast’s finale raise further possibilities. Here and there throughout the movie there are moments when Moll discovers a french window open at night in the family home; is it possible she’s been making nocturnal excursions without remembering she’s done so? In other words, could she be the serial killer? This might tie in with a seeming discontinuity early in the movie, whereby it’s high afternoon when Moll flees her birthday party yet well into the evening when she flits from the house heading for the nightclub. Much is made of the fact that the killer’s latest victim was abducted the very evening of Moll’s birthday party. Could the movie be acknowledging some missing hours—missing hours when Moll was committing murder?

It’s a question I can’t answer. What I can say with certainty is that I found Beast immensely absorbing and, in its finale, emotionally and intellectually challenging. It’s a movie that’ll assuredly remain in my mind a very long time, and one I imagine I’ll be rewatching more than once. Clearly a lot of the critics reacted similarly; those accolades I mentioned Buckley having won are just the tip of the iceberg for the movie as a whole, and particularly for its director and writer, Matthew Pearce.

There was, by the way, a real Beast of Jersey. In the 1960s and early 1970s Edward Paisnel carried out a string of rapes and sexual assaults on the island, being eventually caught only through lucky chance. His crimes were actually very different in nature from those committed by the killer in Beast, so perhaps we shouldn’t be tempted to read too much into the parallels.


12 thoughts on “Beast (2017)

  1. An excellent, thoughtful post on a very good film. I think you’ve captured the film’s nuances and ambiguities extremely well, so much so that you’ve made me want to go back and see it again. The dynamic between Moll and Pascal has a strange magnetic quality which makes it very compelling to watch.

    • Thanks for the kind words, Jacqui. It’s indeed one of those movies where one feels a rewatch could be even more enjoyable than the first time. You’ve got me now thinking I should maybe dig it out for a second spin.

  2. “I began to wonder why Peter Jackson chose to go all the way to New Zealand to film his Tolkien movies when there was Jersey right there on his doorstep.”
    Actually, New Zealand is on Peter Jackson’s doorstep. Nor is Jersey “to the south of England’s south coast and roughly equidistant from France”. It’s just off the coast of Normandy – the Channel Islands are the remnants from when William I doubled up as Duke of Normandy and King of England.
    There’s a very strange and chilling – I’ve never known how deliberate it is – novel inspired by the real Beast of Jersey: Something Nasty in the Woodshed by Kyril Bonfiglioli. Like a slasher written by P.G. Wodehouse.

    • I thought Jackson was based in the UK these days. Forgive me if I’m wrong. Rephrase it along the lines of “Why did he drag everyone else there . . .?” And you’re right about the C.I. too: I recalled them as being a bit closer to France than England but, having now looked at a map, I see the disparity’s a lot bigger than I’d thought. (A silly mistake for me to make, as my father’s [estranged] family came from Guernsey.)

      I read the Bonfiglioli novel many years ago and can now remember virtually nothing beyond the title and the fact that I didn’t much enjoy it. I knew of him through his editorship of Science Fantasy/Impulse, so it may have been that I was expecting something quite other than what I got. I see the movie Mortdecai (2015) is based on the series of which this novel was a part. I may have to have a look at it.

      • But wasn’t Jackson still based in NZ when he began the Tolkien films? That’s aside from the fact there’s much more room to film in in NZ, and even with modern special effects presumably that does make a difference.
        Victor Hugo – exiled in Guernsey – could see the coast of France from his house. It’s said that his admirers used to take telescopes and try to see him from France.
        The first two Mortdecai novels were funny and entertaining. Something Nasty in the Woodshed was very different. I don’t know if Bongfiglioli was trying to get a contrast between an unreliable narrator and the story he told, but it just didn’t work. The gap between teller and tale is so great. I didn’t see the film, but it got some of the worst reviews of all time. A friend who did see says the reviews flattered it, so you can’t say you haven’t been warned!

        • Thanks for the warning about Mortdecai. It’s on its way from the library, so we’ll see.

          As a child I stood in Hugo’s study on Guernsey. We reckoned that the tale of him being able to see France must just have been poetic license. Mind you, maybe it was hazy that day or we were looking in the wrong direction . . . Or maybe he, too, used a telescope.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.