In mid-October 2013 the publisher Limelight released my book A Comprehensive Encyclopedia of Film Noir: The Essential Reference Guide. The book has entries on well over 3,000 films noirs and related movies from all over the world, including over 2,000 from the US alone.
The purpose of Noirish is to act as an extension to the Encyclopedia -- an annex, if you like -- where I can add entries for movies that for one reason or another didn't make it into the printed book.
In some instances, this is just because the movie concerned was released too late for inclusion.
Most often, though, the reason was logistic. Although the Encyclopedia takes the broadest possible view of film noir, there were some movies that were either too obscure or too tangential to the theme to merit the use of precious page space: 800+ large-format pages -- nearly 700,000 words -- may seem a lot but, when you're trying to cover in excess of 3,000 movies, you soon learn to appreciate the constraints.
That's why this enterprise has the title it has: Noirish. Many of the movies here are very borderline noir, and some aren't noir at all but have associational interest.
Just because a movie's obscure doesn't mean it's lousy . . . although there'll be some lousy movies covered here. There'll also be plenty of movies that are, shall we say, undistinguished -- which is not to say they're without at least some points of interest, and certainly isn't to say they're not lots of fun to watch.
After posting a bunch of entries to get myself started, I'll be adding new movies to Noirish as and when I watch them.
Thanks for these links. I’ve just clicked through to the excellent review of Far From Heaven. Julianne Moore is one of my favourite actors, and the film is such a brilliant tribute to Sirk in every sense. Thanks for the reminder as I have it on DVD somewhere, but it’s been a while since I watched it. As for Double Indemnity, that’s in my all-time top five, for sure…
I’m very fond of Double Indemnity myself, although I’m still not convinced of its status as a romantic movie. I know the reasoning is that obsession is part of the “romance” spectrum, but by that measure then Moby Dick could be considered a romantic novel. (And maybe, come to think of it, some people do regard it as such.)
As with yourself, I was reminded by the essay on Far from Heaven that I should dig it out for another viewing.
Yes, I know what you mean. Although Phyllis is one of cinema’s femme fatales, so I’m happy to go with it on account of her magnetism and the obsessive aspect you mention. Funnily enough, I re-read Cain’s novella not so long ago, and there’s something animal, almost leopard-like about Phyllis.
Either way, it’s a great film. Thanks for posting these links.
I reread the novel a few years ago, and was surprised by the differences between it and the movie. I eventually found myself thinking of them as two different entities, both equally good.